Speech Perception Deficits in Poor Readers
Speech
Perception Deficits in Poor Readers: Auditory Processing or Phonological
Coding?
Author(s)
Maria Mody, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, and Susan Brady
Journal
Reference:(s)
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64, 199–231 (1997)
Abstract:(s)
Poor readers are inferior to normal-reading peers in aspects of speech
perception. Two hypotheses have been proposed to account for their
deficits:
(i) a speech-specific failure in phonological representation
and
(ii) a general deficit in auditory ‘‘temporal processing,’’ such that
they cannot easily perceive the rapid spectral changes of formant transitions at
the onset of stop-vowel syllables.
To test these hypotheses, two groups
of second-grade children (20 ‘‘good readers,’’ 20 ‘‘poor readers’’), matched for
age and intelligence, were selected to differ significantly on a /ba/–/da/
temporal order judgment (TOJ) task, said to be diagnostic of a temporal
processing deficit. Three experiments then showed that the groups did not differ
in:
(i) TOJ when /ba/ and /da/ were paired with more easily discriminated
syllables (/ba/–/sa/, /da/–/Sa/);
(ii) discriminating nonspeech sine wave
analogs of the second and third formants of /ba/ and /da/;
(iii)
sensitivity to brief transitional cues varying along a synthetic
speech
continuum. Thus, poor readers’ difficulties with /ba/–/da/
reflected perceptual confusion between phonetically similar, though
phonologically contrastive, syllables rather than difficulty in perceiving rapid
spectral changes. The results are consistent with a speech-specific, not a
general auditory, deficit.
# of Citations - 176
If you know about additional recommended research items that you think are important please fill in our contact form.